If there has been a constant vocal presence in my life it has been Guy Clark's half whisper, half raspy wail coming through fuzzy speakers. I grew up in a house hold with a songwriter and picker, and Guy Clark was my stepdaddy's deepest inspiration. This makes sense, he is the 'songwriter's songwriter' ( though if you ask Mr. Clark he will tell him he hates that title because you don't make a living that way), but more than that he was a hard living man with a spark of humor that permeates every thing he writes from the most serious and sad on down to silly songs about fruit. This was my stepdaddy, Bill, in a nutshell. He died while working through falling off the wagon when I was 18, just a few days before my prom and I still remember the last things he said to me were that he was going to have to start cheering for those 'dirty sooner bastards' because I had received a full ride to the University of Oklahoma, and bragging that he had bought a crimson and cream jersey (but was pretending it was for Alabama). He and Guy were two peas shelled from the same pod, eternal troublemakers and jokers.
I've listened to very little Guy Clark (or Townes Van Zandt . . .or Steve Earl) since Bill's death. It just hurts too much to hear these men whose lyrics I'd had memorized since I was a little girl, men whose voices constantly echoed through our home mixed with laughter or screaming or mismatched guitar. Guy Clark especially is the soundtrack to my childhood, the trigger for the memory of every hug and fight I had with my stepdaddy. It is good music, but you will have to forgive me for putting it away for a time.
With all the buzz around Guy's new album "My favorite Picture of You" I feel like I am obligated to finally spend more than a minute or two listening to his voice. I am glad I sat down and took a listen to this album, very glad. I am not the kind of person to go this is the Guy's version of *insert final album of elder statesmen of country or folk of your choice*, but I will tell you I am very impressed with the level of nostalgia, regret, and general aged wisdom that this album exudes from the very first chords of the first song, "cornmeal waltz."
I imagine that if you are a long time Guy Clark fan you will not be disappointed. He has lost none of his humor, honesty, or talent. For new listeners this is the album I would most likely recommend for younger listeners. I do not think it contains the best single songs, or has the best over all composition of his career, but I do think that it has great quality of sound, and I think that Guy is mellowing with age and his sound now is something that is more likely to appeal to people who are accustomed to the cleaner sounding indie folk like Iron and Wine or Mumford and Sons.
I think that if you are older than 30 then it really depends on how country you like things. If you prefer a more rock sound I would say his self named album is probably the best *though you should be aware that he never gets much away from twangy country, there is even some yodeling*. I personally love "Texas Cookin" so if you like country or more ballad type music you should give it a listen.
I really did like the title song very much, but I think that it may be a little overhyped. My personal favorites on this album are "The High Price of Inspiration" and "Hellbent on a Heartache" . The first is just so personal. I really believe that Guy put everything he had into this song. The effect of listening to it is like hearing someone's inner monologue on their worst qualities. It is just masterfully written. "Hellbent on a Heartache" is just one of those songs that I think almost everyone can relate to at some point in their life. It is sort of wistful and angry more than it is sad. Reminds me a lot of "Comfort and Crazy" but less personal, or rather less attached. It is the same song but with the lover removed. I just loved it.
The point is that this album is full of great music, most importantly great lyrics, and you can listen to it *for free* on Guy's Website along with most if not all of his other music, and I would encourage you to purchase from the site as well. I don't think I will be able to put Mr. Clark away for any amount of time again. . .now I am going to go cuddle into a blanket and cry for a while.
Raves, Rants, and Rambles
Wednesday, July 31, 2013
Sunday, June 23, 2013
"The Purge" or why security systems don't work.
So,
“The Purge” may have gotten a lot more attention than I
originally thought it would when seeing a YouTube advertisement for
it months ago. I am glad for that because I thought from first look
that it would be an interesting movie. For those of you who have not
seen a trailer or commercial for it the basic premise of the film is
that after a revolution America's society is reconstructed with an
emphasis of a night of lawlessness that provides catharsis to the
constant violence living inside everyone thus causing crime rates to
drop and general standards of living to go up.
Yes
I am aware that this has some very basic flaws not the least of
which is how the hell you could get enough people to agree to doing
this that it would be enforceable? Maybe I am just a hopeless dreamer
but I like to believe that most people would be against the
legalization of cold-blooded murder for even one night, if only for
reasons of self-preservation.
The
movie provides most of the answers to the very basic plot questions
that might arise, demonstrating a religious reverence for what can be
assumed to be a military state considering the level of surveillance
portrayed in the film.
The
more important plot element is introduced first through a radio
broadcast as an academic discussion that is arguably supported by the
events of the film. This argument was that the Purge was designed by
the government as a means of eliminating the poor who can't afford to
protect themselves and thus boosting the economy and lowering crime
statistics not actually by lowering crime, but by creating a window
of opportunity.
I
don't want to spoil the actual meat of the plot because there are
some red herrings and twists that are fun to puzzle through. My
opinion on the film is largely positive when it comes to the idea.
The acting was also very good, especially Lena Heady. You get the
feeling that she doesn't believe her own support of the Purge from
the very beginning. She is drinking from the moment she walks on
screen and she plays secretly tortured very well. The son is also
quite good, in a heartbreakingly pure kind of way. Ethan Hawke is
just surprising. I haven't seen him be such an entitled douche since
Reality Bites and it was kind of nostalgic. (Secret, I kind of hate
Reality Bites)
The
scene stealer is (unsurprisingly) the villain. Smiley as I am want to
call him, is named in script as Polite Stranger. He is polite,
truthfully. I have never seen someone so very polite in such an
extreme homicidal rage. It was well done. The guy is very creepy
(reminded me of Viserys Targaryen) but is also just so charming.
Really. It is a little unsubtle and I am pretty sure that the guy was
probably imitating Paul Ryan the whole time (really, the message was
that heavy handed . . . elitism with a sympathetic face will still
kill you). He is unfortunately the major problem with the film.
Short
version review is that while it was fun to watch, the mechanics of
the film left something to be desired and the world created had so
much more potential than what they gave it.
This
is where the spoilers begin, also the curse words.
Why
the fuck with such an interesting premise did this film turn into
your everyday home invasion stalker story? Yes it has some novel
developments, namely that the family is not the target of the killers
but it is instead a homeless man let into the house by their son (the
only person who seems to vocalize that killing is probably bad from
the beginning). This creates an interesting game of hide and seek but
makes the main characters of the film so very unsympathetic that it
is hard to watch.
First
off, I thought it was the neighbors who were going to kill them from
the beginning and in a totally unsurprising 'twist' they come to save
them from the strange home invaders with less than honorable
intentions (basically you sold me a home protection system and I hate
you for gouging me). The best plot twist from what the perspective of
a home invasion could totally have been that the strangers really
couldn't have gotten into the house and the people in the house were
monsters for trussing up a homeless man and sending him out to be
killed. I thought this was coming for most of the film and honestly
once the strangers got in the home I lost most interest with the
exception of really enjoying Lena Heady breaking the nose of her
bitchy neighbor.
It
really did become your stereotypical slasher film with a great
setting, the only interesting thing was the political commentary
which was for the most part sloppily handled. . . with the exception
of what I really want to talk about: Security Systems.
As
the strangers threaten the home it is revealed that while the
security system might handle looters, it was never meant for the
worst case scenario of someone desperate to break in to kill you. For
me this was much more interesting than the obvious (though true and
heartbreaking) reality of class biased crime laws. It raised a lot of
points about obsession with the semblance of security in America. The
movie drops lines from 'things like this aren't supposed to happen in
our neighborhood' to ' it looks good and it works 90 percent of the
time' (not direct quotes don't skewer me). It made me think about
'good neighborhoods' and the hypocrisy of truly believing that humans
are capable of the worst, but only in certain places. More than that
it made me think about the efficacy of security systems and how for
the most part we are just hoping that the little sign and the loud
noise scare away an intruder, because if they really want to rob you
or kill you, the police couldn't respond quickly enough to stop them.
It is an elaborate construct to make us feel safe that really doesn't
have much effect on the problem. And the film explores all sorts of
moral issues stemming from selling this kind of system. It is
probably the best part of the actual film excluding the setting. It
really is to bad that the producers seemed to think that this wasn't
worth the focus of the film and it fades to the background of a
'daddy please save the day' plot.
I
recommend it purely on a few satisfying moments and the fact that the
premise is good and I think we should reward that, but it was lazily
executed. Comment on my facebook or on the blog here with all the
things you would have liked to see explored in the film. For me it
would have been “ what do the anti-purge people do on purge
night?”.
Sunday, June 16, 2013
Man of Steel . . . why it kind of sucked.
I've
never made it a secret that I am not a big fan of Superman (or
Captain America for that matter.) They have always been a little to
apple pie and gung-ho for my tastes. Batman and Thor have been my
long time favorites, not that I see any particular connection off the
top of my head (though wouldn't that be an interesting topic to
explore.) I was very excited about “Man of Steel” though.
Watching the commercials I felt that what I was being offered was a
Chris Nolan-esque reinterpretation of the Superman myth to a more
believable and modernized mood. While in some ways this was achieved
I feel that on the whole the movie was a disappointment. My short
answer is that it is worth seeing (though you will probably be
disappointed) but I wouldn't pay for the 3D experience.
Now
that my short answer is out of the way lets get to the meat of any
review: the analysis. This is where the SPOILERS can be assumed to
start.
Good
Stuff:
The
special effects were very good in the sense of design and
construction. They were very vast, almost overwhelming in my IMAX
viewing experience. Most importantly Krypton was fascinating and
desolately beautiful. In particular the costuming and the design of
the visual interface for the planet was very interesting. The texture
you see on Superman's costumes in the poster is carried heavily
throughout their clothing and it really added to the detail that
makes a scene more believable. To be honest I think that the opening
scenes in Krypton are some of the best in the film, just from an
aesthetic viewpoint.
I
really enjoyed a lot of the actors performances. It really was the
minor supporting roles that stole the show for me. Diane Lane was
endearing and very convincing as the homespun Mama Kent and
Christopher Meloni (Stabler of SVU fame) played Colonel Nathan Hardy,
possibly the only character who showed progressive character
development. Kevin Costner was all right, as was Lawrence Fishburne,
but Russell Crowe far surpassed his A-list cohorts. He was fantastic
as Jor-El and it is my favorite role for him since “Gladiator”.
Henry Cavill was a good fit for Superman and he definitely pulled off
the good-guy charm. Amy Adams was perky and sassy as always and I
appreciated that I could actually stand to see her walk on screen
(*ahem* Pepper Potts.)The acting in my opinion saved this film from
being a beautiful disaster. Also, I don't know the name of the female
Kryptonian soldier but kudos for being creepy and fantastic.
The
Bad Stuff
The
3D was atrocious. I want to give it a little bit of a pass because I
had bad seats but. . .it was actually very distracting. The only good
3D effects were in scenes involving people underwater.
The
dialogue was extremely lacking. Granted I have been recently spoiled
by “The Avengers” (thank you Mr. Whedon) but I honestly wasn't
holding it up to that standard. I was hoping for the dialogue to hold
up to the first “Ironman” or “Thor”. It failed miserably. The
dialogue was stilted and awkward. It was best on Krypton where I
could excuse the lack of vivacity, humor, and uniqueness I always
hope for in a script by saying that it had to do with a strict
hierarchical culture. I unfortunately couldn't excuse the slow boring
interactions of what were supposed to be modern Americans. It was
just so lackluster. There may have been three moments after the
opening sequence and before the closing sequence that had any life at
all. It was just genuinely a bore on the character development front.
Not to mention that as per usual the female parts are grossly
underwritten, this flick even commits my cardinal damsel in distress
sin. . .she can save herself but only through the guidance of a
father figure.
The
movie had too many action scenes. It was literally action scene after
action scene. I was so tired of it. It wasn't even fun anymore after
a while. The worst part about it was that so many of them were the
type where it is two omnipotents battling and never tiring or hurting
each other. BORING.
I
felt that they set up the end of the climax in a way that made
Superman as reprehensible as the villain of the film. It was very
unsatisfying. It just didn't jive with the good-guy persona they are
going for.
Predictions:
Thursday, June 13, 2013
10 songs that I love that you probably either dislike or haven't heard. . .:(
Well,
I've said I may want to talk about music occaisionally on this blog,
and since I can't get up the energy to talk about Star Trek (spoiler,
it is enjoyable but I can't separate actual film quality from
fanservice) or After Earth (still too disappointed), I figure
offering a little back information that gives a little insight to my
music taste might be handy.
The
best way I can think of to give some idea where my taste in music
lies is to give a list of my favorite songs with short reasoning for
each of them.
I
love this song because not only does it make me laugh, it makes me
happy to be myself. It is this testament to something I like about
myself: Thriftiness. I love a lot of Macklemore's music, I find it
filled with a uniquely positive attitude that actually stands for
something. It is uplifting in an honest and realistic way. It doesn't
feel trite. I would have never found his music if not for this song
and I still haven't tired of it. I listen to it and I swear it is
just as funny as the first time I heard it. It isn't his best song,
but it is near and dear to my heart. Also, that awesome sax riff is
my hero.
I
love this song. It is listed as my favorite song in my senior book
(small towns do awesome stuff like give seniors a whole page in a
book every senior gets to take home for free). I think it is one of
the most beautiful and truthful love songs ever written. We all fight
with our significant others from time to time, but there is something
that is almost religious about finding a perfect moment of clarity
about your special someone. This song captures those moments of
spiritual clarity perfectly and is beautiful to boot.
Yes,
I am a self confessed lover of 80's hair metal, and as much as they
tried to escape it, that is definitely what GNR is. I love a good
political tune, and this one is especially poignant, I think the
woman in the intro is really why I love the song so much. That little
bit sets the mood of anger and resistance and futility so well. Gives
me goosebumps. Also of note, it is the only GNR tune I still listen
too frequently.
Well.
. .I don't know if I can explain this one decently enough to make any
of you forgive me. . . as my father has often told me it is just
rude to admit you like George Micheal. People really do go nuts about
him being untalented. . .but the truth is I think he is fantastic, or
was fantastic before all the legal troubles. That said this song yet
again makes me insanely happy. It is the best car singing song in the
world. I think most of us are hopeless dreamers at heart, and this
song totally caters to the idea that by believing in something we
make it more real, make it more likely. . .I am choosing to believe
that after reading this one you didn't instantly loose respect for my
taste in music.
I
know that if Faith didn't sour your disposition this one probably
will, but gosh-darn-it before everyone started complaining about
whiny emo/scene music this band was really cool. In my opinion this
album still is really cool. I love how snarky and verbose they are.
They get vindictive really well, and honestly I have a bit of a
vengeful streak. I purge it by listening to their biting commentary
on love gone wrong and then watching The Boondock Saints.
Okay,
I need to regain my legitimacy now. I love Carole King. Tapestry is
in my top five best albums of all time. This song is my favorite off
of that album and it is the single best song about loving yourself
ever written. Where other songs are about how other people hurt you
and you have to work past it, this song is just saying life is hard,
but if you believe in yourself you can make yourself one of the
better parts of it. It is perfect and everyone should listen to it
while getting ready in the morning. I do.
Yes
it is a Disney song. It is fantastic. It is SIR Elton John people. If
he and Phil Collins can both agree that Disney is an appropriate
venue to express talent then you should rethink your stance against
these classics. This song is epic. This is how I want to believe in
love. Breaking down boundaries, making us all the same. The most
powerful force in the world. Hell yeah!
So
RENT changed my life. Really. It is a big part of what moved me to be
an LGBT activist. La Vie Bohemme is the anthem for every misfit and
deviant that ever lived. It rouses to action and celebrates
diversity. It is a kind of controversial I can totally get behind and
every lyric rolls off the tongue in this really pleasing staccato
rhythm. It is irresistibly singable and uplifting. This is the first
showtune I learned by heart, the first musical I grew to love as an
adult. Showtunes and learning to love musical theatre has been a
major part of my life and my love of this song is equal parts
meaningful and nostalgia.
This is
the most recently discovered song on my list. I cried the first time
I heard it. I had a deep felt sense of connection to the lyrics and
the sound. It reminds me a great deal of my stepfather who played the
guitar. Maybe it is just that I discovered it as I was entering my
senior year of college but the yearning for meaning, for connection
to something bigger than oneself really hit me hard. I love it, the
lyrics are a work of art that I put up with the best poetry I have
ever read. Go listen if you haven't heard it.
This has
been my favorite song since I was. . .12? Which is weird because I
don't think I had the experience or emotional range to really
appreciate this song at that age. . . but it made me cry for reasons
I didn't understand. Whenever I picture a particularly difficult
scene in a book this song is in the background. It is all about not
knowing how to fix a relationship that is essentially good but has
problems like any other relationship. I like music that is real, that
says something that is hard to express. This song is just chalk full
of ennui. It is my favorite, though another song by Jeff Buckley (his
cover of Hallelujah) does provide challenge. Jeff Buckley died too
young. Go enjoy his awesomeness.
And that is
all my friends, my ten favorite songs. They have fluctuated over the
years, but the top has stayed at the top and most of them have been
somewhere on the list for quite some time. So next time I blog about
music and you don't understand my view maybe this list will help.
Friday, June 7, 2013
Now You See Me
Let me be perfectly honest potential readers, I picked my first topic simply because I liked the idea of using the movies title for the title of my first post. "Now You See Me". . .it has a cryptic and playful kind of flair and I am enjoying looking at it up there on the bar immensely. You must admit that it is a pretty apt title for an entrance to the blogosphere.
Before I get to talking about this film though, let me give you a brief rundown of what you are going to see on this blog. I love books. I love movies. I love television. I love music. Really what it comes down to is that I love stories and being entertained. This is my place to critique and review anything and everything I feel like. I will keep it to the categories of books, film, television, games, and music; Do not expect reviews of any websites, commercials, magazine articles, clothes, or interior design here. I will also aim to keep it current, though a nostalgia post will probably crop up from time to time.
So, let's talk about magic. . .
. . . Specifically movie magic. "Now You See Me" may just be the single best 'action' flick I have seen in an excessively long time. In fact I think the last action film I saw that I would even classify as being in the same league as this film would be "RED: Retired and Extremely Dangerous". I am excluding movies that were good but cannot be classified as action over science-fiction or fantasy ("Star Trek: Into Darkness" comes to mind). This film doesn't even smack of the brooding art-house drama that I've come to expect of decent action films (see "The Girl With the Dragon Tattoo"). No, this was a no-bones-about-it, action-packed-heist spectacle in the vein of "Ocean's Eleven" and "The Italian Job" and it was absolutely fantastic. Why I enjoyed this movie so much, and honestly why you should go see it, boils down to three simple components: Engaging plot, fantastic fight sequences, and Mark Ruffalo.
The most important thing this movie has going for it is,surprisingly enough, plot. It isn't that it has anything incredibly important to say (though it is rather political for a feel-good action flick) or that it is especially innovative, but rather that it employs the traditions of the illusionist to create a consistent internal logic that serves not only as the framework for every scene of the film, but as a subtle push that goads the audience into chasing twists they have no chance of predicting. This movie could definitely be described as having a gimmick, but they lean on the illusionist theme in the best possible way. First off they incorporate everything from street magicians hustling for a payout, to the polished sensationalism of escape artistry. They don't just beat you to death with David Copperfield references the whole movie is really what I am getting at here. Secondly the plot is all twists and turns and tailor-made to keep the movie from getting too kitschy. It fits the theme but doesn't exploit it. Last but not least it doesn't lose the staples of action trade to incorporate the theme. There is still everything from high-speed car chases to foreign intrigue. This is the kind of movie that explored every part of the mythos, stereotypes, and realities of a niche profession and utilized the knowledge to craft a proper story without assuming that tropes and traditions are automatically outmoded and without merit.
As for those traditional action movie staples, the standouts are definitely the fight scenes. Like the rest of the film they uniquely incorporate the props and techniques of illusionists. In particular a scene in a simple apartment featuring the least explored character, Jack Wilder, really showcases how spectacular the combination of magic and hand to hand combat can be. I don't want to ruin too much of the surprise on what exactly gets utilized but to give a little taste let me just say that it is not all typical stage magician tricks, even hypnosis is used as a method of defense. To sum it up the fight scenes are both spectacular and surprisingly simple.
Oh. . .and last but certainly not least. . . if you hadn't yet realized it Mark Ruffalo's participation pretty much guarantees a good movie going experience. I have yet to see him in a role he couldn't pull off and the overworked, hyper-realistic FBI agent he plays in this film is certainly not an exception. He is gruff but likable, and his interaction with the french interpol agent is endearing and not hormone induced. It is refreshing to see a partnership between a man and woman grow to friendship before any possible romance.
Probably the one downside to this film, in my humble opinion, was the casting of Isla Fisher. I found her character to be flat, vapid, and possibly unnecessary. From what I can tell a change in casting could have gone a large way towards changing that fact. All this said, she still serves her purpose and my complaints are minor. The french interpol agent provides a more balanced and interesting female character to keep my feminism at bay.
Basically, go see this movie. It is well worth the ticket price and you will definitely want a popcorn ;).
Thank you for taking the time to read my first blog!
Before I get to talking about this film though, let me give you a brief rundown of what you are going to see on this blog. I love books. I love movies. I love television. I love music. Really what it comes down to is that I love stories and being entertained. This is my place to critique and review anything and everything I feel like. I will keep it to the categories of books, film, television, games, and music; Do not expect reviews of any websites, commercials, magazine articles, clothes, or interior design here. I will also aim to keep it current, though a nostalgia post will probably crop up from time to time.
So, let's talk about magic. . .
. . . Specifically movie magic. "Now You See Me" may just be the single best 'action' flick I have seen in an excessively long time. In fact I think the last action film I saw that I would even classify as being in the same league as this film would be "RED: Retired and Extremely Dangerous". I am excluding movies that were good but cannot be classified as action over science-fiction or fantasy ("Star Trek: Into Darkness" comes to mind). This film doesn't even smack of the brooding art-house drama that I've come to expect of decent action films (see "The Girl With the Dragon Tattoo"). No, this was a no-bones-about-it, action-packed-heist spectacle in the vein of "Ocean's Eleven" and "The Italian Job" and it was absolutely fantastic. Why I enjoyed this movie so much, and honestly why you should go see it, boils down to three simple components: Engaging plot, fantastic fight sequences, and Mark Ruffalo.
The most important thing this movie has going for it is,surprisingly enough, plot. It isn't that it has anything incredibly important to say (though it is rather political for a feel-good action flick) or that it is especially innovative, but rather that it employs the traditions of the illusionist to create a consistent internal logic that serves not only as the framework for every scene of the film, but as a subtle push that goads the audience into chasing twists they have no chance of predicting. This movie could definitely be described as having a gimmick, but they lean on the illusionist theme in the best possible way. First off they incorporate everything from street magicians hustling for a payout, to the polished sensationalism of escape artistry. They don't just beat you to death with David Copperfield references the whole movie is really what I am getting at here. Secondly the plot is all twists and turns and tailor-made to keep the movie from getting too kitschy. It fits the theme but doesn't exploit it. Last but not least it doesn't lose the staples of action trade to incorporate the theme. There is still everything from high-speed car chases to foreign intrigue. This is the kind of movie that explored every part of the mythos, stereotypes, and realities of a niche profession and utilized the knowledge to craft a proper story without assuming that tropes and traditions are automatically outmoded and without merit.
As for those traditional action movie staples, the standouts are definitely the fight scenes. Like the rest of the film they uniquely incorporate the props and techniques of illusionists. In particular a scene in a simple apartment featuring the least explored character, Jack Wilder, really showcases how spectacular the combination of magic and hand to hand combat can be. I don't want to ruin too much of the surprise on what exactly gets utilized but to give a little taste let me just say that it is not all typical stage magician tricks, even hypnosis is used as a method of defense. To sum it up the fight scenes are both spectacular and surprisingly simple.
Oh. . .and last but certainly not least. . . if you hadn't yet realized it Mark Ruffalo's participation pretty much guarantees a good movie going experience. I have yet to see him in a role he couldn't pull off and the overworked, hyper-realistic FBI agent he plays in this film is certainly not an exception. He is gruff but likable, and his interaction with the french interpol agent is endearing and not hormone induced. It is refreshing to see a partnership between a man and woman grow to friendship before any possible romance.
Probably the one downside to this film, in my humble opinion, was the casting of Isla Fisher. I found her character to be flat, vapid, and possibly unnecessary. From what I can tell a change in casting could have gone a large way towards changing that fact. All this said, she still serves her purpose and my complaints are minor. The french interpol agent provides a more balanced and interesting female character to keep my feminism at bay.
Basically, go see this movie. It is well worth the ticket price and you will definitely want a popcorn ;).
Thank you for taking the time to read my first blog!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)